展开讨论

经验与复盘编辑摘编

跨仓库工作,也是上下文管理问题

gwerbin 需要综合三个仓库和多份业务文档,发现较弱的推理设置容易遗漏关联信息,而冗长的输出又增加了审阅难度。他在思考:检索式记忆系统能否缓解这种跨资料工作的负担?

原文节选

“I found that I need the big model and the high reasoning effort on tasks where I have a large amount of details of”

阅读完整原文
源讨论Anthropic appears to be A/B testing reduced effort levels in Claude Code
讨论

这条内容在回应什么?

父级讨论 · 原文节选

ON

I initially had unbelievably terrible experiences with Opus 5 and Fable in their higher reasoning levels. I've had WAY better results on medium effort. IIUC, the consensus seems to be that anything more than medium effort is rarely worth it - and you far more often run into these extreme worst cases than you do with even the lowest effort levels. That definitely coincides with my anecdata. It's really only worth it if you're hoping to win the lottery asking it to solve an Erdos problem.

完整原文

社区评论 0

还没有社区评论,来聊聊你的看法。

原讨论中的回复 0

仅展示本次导入中包含的直接回复,原文节选。

本次样本未包含直接回复,可以前往 Hacker News 继续阅读。

在 Hacker News 阅读

尊重不同观点,分享具体经验。

登录后即可发帖、评论、转发和引用。