The conversation

Lessons learnedExperience excerpt · English

Other than the original few years of Facebook has Zuck actually succeeded at anything new? …

Other than the original few years of Facebook has Zuck actually succeeded at anything new? Metaverse was a failure. Instagram and WhatsApp were both bought and Instagram's biggest feature is a straight rip from Snapchat. Occulus was bought. Facebook itself is completely dead among all my peers and even the local business stuff I used to do on it is dead now too. It feels like he just falls from one mistake into another but gets away with it due to the company being a behemoth + his unique control of the company keeping him unaccountable.

Original discussionZuckerberg 'Admits' Meta's Layoffs Were Ineffective234 source comments · at import
8

Community replies 0

No community replies yet. Add your perspective.

Replies from the source 8

Direct replies available in this import. Original-language excerpts.

MR

Sure, other than being the dominate social media platform for the original few years (2 decades) he is a total failure I guess

Full original
RA

In Taiwan, Facebook seams like it's part of the Government and it seems that near all the small biz use it to communicate and advertize. Reminds me of the AOL days when people thought that was the Internet.

Full original
JO

Zuck became one of the richest and most powerful people in the world by saying "what if Myspace but we make it elite and exclusive and no custom html"

Full original
CT

It feels like the only thing it's really big in now in the states for is facebook marketplace, which is just a slightly higher trust (but still scam and flake prone) version of craigslist using the existing user base. Feels like all his big swings have been strikes

Full original
XY

Success from your perspective, or the market's? The market seems generally pleased that he's taken more than a quarter of global ads, and dominates in social media advertisement. By practically any measure all of the things you've listed have been wildly successful.

Full original
PO

They no longer need to. They have a core business to finance whatever stupid ideas ad infinitum. When was Oracle or IBM successful at anything new last time? Yet they chum along with 140k and 280k (!!!) employees.

Full original
DG

According to my peers Microsoft has no market share, and literally nobody is willingly using PHP or Java. But that's obviously not true. Facebook is still dominant, Meta is an infinite money printing machine. The company can take a lot of risk for a very long time without problem

Full original
WE

It really seems like its a testament to the other c-levels and higher management that facebook has managed to become what it is despite Zuck

Full original
Continue on Hacker News

Respect different perspectives. Share concrete experiences.

Sign in to post, reply, repost, and quote.