The conversation

Business & incomeExperience excerpt · English

This won't be at a 5yo level, but here's an attempt: there are a two things specific to private …

This won't be at a 5yo level, but here's an attempt: there are a two things specific to private equity that often leads to higher prices and worsening service: 1. PE aren't investors like you and me. We can go to our brokerage and buy shares of a public company, hold those shares, vote on directors and proposals, etc... Or we can buy and sell ETF/mutual fund shares that own companies. Then, we (or fund managers) can sell those shares after any period of time we want. Could be years, decades, or minutes. Whatever meets our investing goals. The same is actually true for hedge funds. We buy a a piece of a company, hold it as long as we want, then sell to take profit/loss. When PE buys a company though, they buy the whole company AND they have a specific timeline in mind. This is because PE firms are actually temporary private "investment funds": partners put in money and expect a certain return on investment after a certain period of time. At the end, that's when the fund needs to wind down and return capital + returns. …

Original discussionPrivate equity firms acquired more than 500 autism centers in past decade: study238 source comments · at import
2

What was this responding to?

Parent context · original excerpt

AR

Can anyone explain me like im 5 - what is the alternative and what’s so special about private equity firms in this context? Like those centers are going to be owned by someone one way or another - what is so special or bad about equity firms vs alternatives? Genuine question. Because I don’t have a clue how this works in US.

Full original

Community replies 0

No community replies yet. Add your perspective.

Replies from the source 2

Direct replies available in this import. Original-language excerpts.

DA

The acquisition of the company can also be financially "meta-strategic", where it doesn't actually matter what service the company provides, but how its assets can be structured or leveraged to extract more value for the PE's stakeholders: - https://www.businessinsider.com/red-lobster-endless-shrimp-b... - Here on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40233029

Full original
AR

That sounds to me then that the problem is not only that PE are incentivized only by profits. But also by the system that disconnects end user’s satisfaction (families with kids on spectrum in this case) from the profit. In other words if users of those centers were part of the profit equation - PE would not be a problem at all. Am I right? If so then the real evil are people who created and support such a system I guess.

Full original
Continue on Hacker News

Respect different perspectives. Share concrete experiences.

Sign in to post, reply, repost, and quote.