The conversation

Business & incomeExperience excerpt · English

I worked on a front line product for US banks and built a process to verify beneficial ownership …

… I worked on a front line product for US banks and built a process to verify beneficial ownership for business account openings. I found the current expectations to be laughable: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/09/30/2022-21... > An individual may be a beneficial owner of a reporting company by indirectly holding 25 percent or more of the ownership interests of the reporting company through multiple exempt entities. Getting around this is not very difficult if you are clever and wealthy. The overall takeaway I had was that these kinds of rules don't really work in the cases where they need to the most. I don't know how much of a deterrent this could ever hope to be. We even developed an override process for this based on a request from one of our clients.

Original discussionHow well does the money laundering control system work?356 source comments · at import
2

Community replies 0

No community replies yet. Add your perspective.

Replies from the source 2

Direct replies available in this import. Original-language excerpts.

DE

Indirectly holding through multiple entities still counts? How would someone legally get around that? It seems like whatever you do, it's still summing up.

Full original
EE

unsurprisingly they killed off the BOI reporting requirement in March [1]: > ALERT [Updated March 26, 2025]: All entities created in the United States — including those previously known as “domestic reporting companies” — and their beneficial owners are now exempt from the requirement to report beneficial ownership information (BOI) to FinCEN. [1] https://www.fincen.gov/boi

Full original
Continue on Hacker News

Respect different perspectives. Share concrete experiences.

Sign in to post, reply, repost, and quote.