The conversation

epolanskiHNSource author
Business & incomeExperience excerpt · English

One of my clients used to make a nice curated list of the important financial and stock market news …

… One of my clients used to make a nice curated list of the important financial and stock market news of the week, it was a niche part of a niche product but people loved it. At some point he thought about automating everything, it became less curated, more spammy, it lost any value and in the end so did the product. Sure there was more news, but it was less curated, edited and the signal to noise ratio got worse. In fact what they did manually was more valuable even if the scope was smaller. Many companies don't understand that and rush into premature optimization. I'll have another example: one of my clients wanted a scraper to automate something his company needed to do manually: check competitors prices on their ecommerces. I built it, way simpler than they wanted (they thought they wanted an app with a proper front end, turns out it was better for both to produce an excel spreadsheet with the data) and they were happy. …

Original discussionDo Things That Don't Scale (2013)113 source comments · at import
4

What was this responding to?

Parent context · original excerpt

XW
xwowsersxHN

Something I heard recently on some podcast which really resonated was (paraphrasing): "Inertia is the biggest issue for a startup. The world doesn't like you, doesn't think it needs you... and you've got to invert that. You have to create momentum by scratch and the most important thing a founder does, by an order of magnitude, is invert inertia. Literally, in a physical sense. Like the world stays at rest and you've got to create momentum." With that in mind, it makes sense to do things that don't scale... because in the beginning, you're not trying to optimize a machine that's already running. You're trying to get the engine to turn over at all. PG's point is that scalable growth comes later; first, you have to manually crank the thing into motion. You do manual stuff not because it's efficient, but because it's the only way to get traction when no one's looking for you in the first pl…

Full original

Community replies 0

No community replies yet. Add your perspective.

Replies from the source 4

Direct replies available in this import. Original-language excerpts.

PI
pimlottcHN

People focus on the primary function they want to automate and forget about all the ancillary functions and effects, which, in aggregate, can be as important as the core function.

Full original
MI
minnappsHN

That's a really good point, doing things manually is an important part of being connected to a job and its outcomes. I will also say, sometimes you need a few hours of little manual tasks to break up the day between brain-heavy tasks.

Full original
DR
drchickensaladHN

This fuels my feelings on why most uses of GenAI are such a step back for society's non-short-term effectiveness.

Full original
30
30minAdayHNHN

Similar thing happens in sales. A gen-AI driven sales tool might write perfect copy and reach 1000 people. But when you go by each person and write a hand-written email to them, the ancillary thing is that you learn about that person. You develop intuition about what sort of people would be right people and develop a perspective about why you can solve their problem or not. This completely gets lost when you automate and play numbers game. This is especially important in zero to one phase.

Full original
Continue on Hacker News

Respect different perspectives. Share concrete experiences.

Sign in to post, reply, repost, and quote.