The conversation

Business & incomeExperience excerpt · English

> What could they possibly want with the data of a group of people who are by construction not …

> What could they possibly want with the data of a group of people who are by construction not spending money on a VPN? They'd be storing it at a loss. This is the exact point where our conclusions diverge. Why are they sending themselves so much "useless" data-intensive logs by default, from their non-paying clients that accounts for roughly ~95% of the userbase and from a profitable business perspective, largely ineligible for troubleshooting support? For me, the only logical conclusion is that the data is valuable to them. As someone who also cares about privacy, hear are a few things that IMO suggest that free customers' logs are a part of their business model: * Their documentation has plenty of references to security, but no references to privacy outside of the privacy policy. * They have all but eliminated any revenue stream from average user when they made an unsolicted announcement that they upgraded their free plan to allow 100 devices and 5 users. * The content they sponsor for marketing/advertising seems targeted for consumers instead of networking professionals. …

Original discussionHow I use Tailscale101 source comments · at import
2

What was this responding to?

Parent context · original excerpt

BE

Eh, as a network administrator you want the netlogs on by default and you very clearly onboard everyone to the network with a memorable warning to do their personal browsing over some other interface. You've usually got at least some minimal audit requirement on any network with high value stuff on it. It's probably not great that someone trying to use the free sample product lands in the same netlogging regime as the work network default, but I suspect thats more about allocation of attention and priority which understandably goes to the companies that make up approximately all of their business. Keeping the free sample product around after its long bern clear "this is for work computers" is just one of those things. The "no support" suffix on a setting is not to me the smoking gun you make it out to be, and I'm pretty hardcore in my attitudes about surveilance. I agree it's the wrong d…

Full original

Community replies 0

No community replies yet. Add your perspective.

Replies from the source 2

Direct replies available in this import. Original-language excerpts.

VL

> Am I correct that when tailscale updates/hijacked resolv.conf, subsequent DNS resolution is passed onto them on visited websites even when tailscale is not being used? I think you're incorrect in the default settings, even when tailscale is active . From the docs, last paragraph under Global nameservers https://tailscale.com/kb/1054/dns#global-nameservers By default, your tailnet's devices use their local DNS settings for all queries. To force clients to always use the nameservers you define, you can enable the Override DNS servers toggle.

Full original
BR

> In my experience, disabling logs was perhaps the only thing that was not configurable through the GUI A lot is not configurable from the GUI. Announcing routes for instance (out of my head, there are other switches I set on tailscale) Or exit nodes

Full original
Continue on Hacker News

Respect different perspectives. Share concrete experiences.

Sign in to post, reply, repost, and quote.