This story has been reposted many times, and I think GJS's remarks (as recorded by Andy Wingo) are …
This story has been reposted many times, and I think GJS's remarks (as recorded by Andy Wingo) are super-interesting as always, but this is really not a great account of "why MIT switched from Scheme to Python." Source: I worked with GJS (I also know Alexey and have met Andy Wingo), and I took 6.001, my current research still has us referring to SICP on a regular basis, and in 2006 Kaijen Hsiao and I were the TAs for what was basically the first offering of the class that quasi-replaced it (6.01) taught by Leslie Kaelbling, Hal Abelson, and Jacob White. I would defer to lots of people who know the story better than me, but here's my understanding of the history. …
Original discussionWhy MIT switched from Scheme to Python (2009)232 source comments · at import