The conversation

Lessons learnedExperience excerpt · English

Also, Yesterday, using v0, I replicated a full nextjs UI copying a major saas player

… Also, Yesterday, using v0, I replicated a full nextjs UI copying a major saas player. No backend integration, but the design and UX were stunning, and better than I could do if I tried. I have 15 years of backend experience at FAANG. Software will get automated, and it already is, people just havent figured it out yet

Original discussionGPT-4.1 in the API492 source comments · at import
6

Community replies 0

No community replies yet. Add your perspective.

Replies from the source 6

Direct replies available in this import. Original-language excerpts.

RV

> Yesterday, using v0, I replicated a full nextjs UI copying a major saas player. No backend integration, but the design and UX were stunning, and better than I could do if I tried. Exactly. Those who do frontend or focus on pretty much anything Javascript are, how should I say it? Cooked? > Software will get automated The first to go are those that use JavaScript / TypeScript engineers have already been automated out of a job. It is all over for them.

Full original
JS

> using v0, I replicated a full nextjs UI copying a major saas player. No backend integration, but the design and UX were stunning AI is amazing, now all you need to create a stunning UI is for someone else to make it first so an AI can rip it off. Not beating the "plagiarism machine" allegations here.

Full original
PH

> The number system differentiates the models based on capability, any other method would not do that. Please rank GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, GPT-4o, GPT-4.1-nano, GPT-4.1-mini, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.5, o1-mini, o1, o1 pro, o3-mini, o3-mini-high, o3, and o4-mini in terms of capability without consulting any documentation.

Full original
WH

> I don't understand the constant complaining about naming conventions. Oh man. Unfolding my lawn chair and grabbing a bucket of popcorn for this discussion.

Full original
LA

> You dont name new versions of software as completely different software macOS releases would like a word with you. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacOS#Timeline_of_releases Technically they still have numbers, but Apple hides them in marketing copy. https://www.apple.com/macos/ Though they still have “macOS” in the name. I’m being tongue-in-cheek.

Full original
TH

> Software will get automated, and it already is, people just havent figured it out yet To be honest I think this is most AI labs (particularly the American ones) not-so-secret goal now, for a number of strong reasons. You can see it in this announcements, Anthrophic's recent Claude 3.7 announcement, OpenAI's first planned agent (SWE-Agent), etc etc. They have to justify their worth somehow and they see it as a potential path to do that. Remains to be seen how far they will get - I hope I'm wrong. The reasons however for picking this path IMO are: - Their usage statistics show coding as the main user: Anthrophic recently released their stats. Its become the main usage of these models, with other usages at best being novelty or conveniences for people in relative size. Without this market IMO the hype would of already fizzled awhile ago at best a novelty when looking at the rest of the us…

Full original
Continue on Hacker News

Respect different perspectives. Share concrete experiences.

Sign in to post, reply, repost, and quote.