The conversation

InvizHNSource author
Lessons learnedExperience excerpt · English

I'm trying to use Cursor for full time building of applications for my personal need ( years of …

I'm trying to use Cursor for full time building of applications for my personal need ( years of experience in the field). It can be rough, but you see the glimpses of the future. In the early weeks, I am constantly having to think of new ways to minimize surprise. Prompt-injection via dotfile (collection of Dos and Donts), forcing LLM to write itself jsdoc @instructions in problematic files, coming up with project overviews that states goals and responsibilities of different parts. It's all very flaky, but there's a promise. I think it is a good time to try mastering the LLM as a helper, and to figure out how to play your best game using this ultra sharp tool. My 2c is that engineer will be needed in the loop to build anything meaningful. It's really hard to shape the play-dough of the codebase having to give up so much control. I see other people who can't validate the LLM BS get themselves into the hole really quickly when using multi-file editing capabilities like the Composer feature. …

Original discussionCheating Is All You Need114 source comments · at import
2

What was this responding to?

Parent context · original excerpt

GA
gatkinsoHN

Have any of these LLM coding assistant enthusiasts actually used them? They are ok at autocomplete and writing types. They cannot yet write "80% of your code" on anything shippable. They regularly miss small but crucial details. The more 'enthusiastic' ones, like Windsurf, subtly refactor code - removing or changing functionality which will have you scratching your head. Programming is a process of building mental models. LLMs are trying to replace something that is fundamental to engineering. Maybe they'll improve, but writing the code was never the hard part. I think the more likely outcome of LLMs is the broad lowering of standards than 5x productivity for all.

Full original

Community replies 0

No community replies yet. Add your perspective.

Replies from the source 2

Direct replies available in this import. Original-language excerpts.

R3
r3c0nc1l3rHN

I too use Cursor as my primary IDE for a variety of projects. This will sound cliche in the midst of the current AI hype, but the most critical component of getting good results with Cursor is properly managing the context and conversation length. With large projects, I've found that a good baseline is about 300-500 lines of output, and around 12 500 line files as input. Inside those limits, Cursor seems to do pretty well, but if you overstuff the context window (even within the supposedly supported limits) Claude Sonnet 3.5 tends to forget important attributes of the input. Another critical component is to keep conversations short. Don't reuse the same conversation for more than one task, and try to engineer prompts to minimize the amount/size of edits. I definitely agree that Cursor isn't a silver bullet, but it's one of the best tools I've found for bootstrapping large projects as a s…

Full original
GA
gatkinsoHN

I use Cursor as well, totally understand what you mean about glimpses of the future. The composer and tab complete are good at writing isolated units of functionality - ie pure functions, especially when they are trivial and have been written before. I appreciate that it saves me a google search or time spent on rote work. I do wonder how much more sophisticated LLMs would have to be to really excel at multi-file or crosscutting whole-codebase editing. I have no way of really quantifying this but I suspect its a lot more than people think, and even then might require a substantially different approach to making software. Kind of reminds me of the people trying to make full length movies with video AI - cool trick but who wants to sit through 1.5 hrs of that? The gulf between those videos and an actual feature length film is _massive_, much like the difference between a prod codebase and …

Full original
Continue on Hacker News

Respect different perspectives. Share concrete experiences.

Sign in to post, reply, repost, and quote.