The conversation

Business & incomeExperience excerpt · English

a) It allows no nuance

… a) It allows no nuance. If I worked for 4 months on a game that I expected to have zero sales outside the first year, I think it's silly to call that a capital asset in any real way. Not all software dev work makes capital assets. The janitor at the Ford factory doesn't get his salary expense amortized, nor should the bug fixer. b) It's all taking effect in this year. Could have switched it gradually over 10 years or something (you need to amortize x% in year 1, 2x% in year 2, etc) c) It's especially tough on small businesses. Microsoft can borrow the cash and make it clear in financial statements that this is a weird tax rule, but according to GAAP/accounting rules it's fine. But a sudden big tax bill is really tough for years 1, 2, 3 of a small business.

Original discussionSoftware firms across US facing tax bills that threaten startup survival981 source comments · at import
2

What was this responding to?

Parent context · original excerpt

MA

What I don't understand is why software developers salaries are treated different than other salaries?

Full original

Community replies 0

No community replies yet. Add your perspective.

Replies from the source 2

Direct replies available in this import. Original-language excerpts.

FL

Also with the factory analogy - unreal is the car factory and you are like the worker who built the factory. (Asking out of ignorance) The workers wages are not treated as a capital to be amortized right?

Full original
IP

Software is an ongoing expense. You spend a million a year each year you would have to break that out over 5 years

Full original
Continue on Hacker News

Respect different perspectives. Share concrete experiences.

Sign in to post, reply, repost, and quote.