The conversation

Business & incomeExperience excerpt · English

Full disclosure: I worked 6 years for a private DNA analysis company

Full disclosure: I worked 6 years for a private DNA analysis company. I left the company over two years ago in pursuit of challenges closer to my passions -- robotics. > Your DNA isn't "public data". You shed DNA every day in dead skin cells; if you're in public then it's effectively public trash and most public trash is... well... public. If you eat or drink at a restaurant then you've left your DNA on the utensils and cups. Even beyond that: Are you sure your relatives haven't given their DNA? It is possible to reconstruct your DNA using the DNA of your relatives. > Nobody's DNA should be harvested and given to a private corporation, no matter what the purported purpose. This much I fully agree on. Private businesses should have no business in DNA analysis. Private businesses aren't beholden to nearly as much public scrutiny. Unfortunately, DNA analysis is (or, was when I left) a growing private business.

Original discussionGoogle obtains thousands of medical records from the Dept of Defense107 source comments · at import
2

What was this responding to?

Parent context · original excerpt

ST

>Second, I don't see any harm in sharing public data (anonymized of course) with any private or public research organizations. Your DNA isn't "public data". Further, those in the military didn't have a choice in the DNA collection. Anyone who chooses to give their DNA to Google, or anyone else, should be free to do so. Nobody's DNA should be harvested and given to a private corporation, no matter what the purported purpose.

Full original

Community replies 0

No community replies yet. Add your perspective.

Replies from the source 2

Direct replies available in this import. Original-language excerpts.

DE

To clarify an important point glossed over and ignored here: This isn't just "public DNA" shed anonymously drifting about in the wind . . . This is the conjunction of two sets - "public DNA" AND the identity and detailed health record of the body that DNA came from. A bucket of "public DNA" is interesting, sure, if you're into that - but it becomes a whole lot more when classified by (say) those that contracted cancer Vs those that didn't - particularly when combined with environmental factors, etc.

Full original
FW

You shed DNA, sure, but that doesn't make it public data. If tomorrow we invented a tool to read your thoughts based on the electromagnetic waves your brain emits, that doesn't suddenly make your thoughts public data.

Full original
Continue on Hacker News

Respect different perspectives. Share concrete experiences.

Sign in to post, reply, repost, and quote.